tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post5266377019460389678..comments2024-03-28T12:34:22.899-05:00Comments on Do U Revit?: Propagate ExtentsDave Baldacchinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00431940617680243953noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-62265582037829463992013-11-11T19:55:48.568-06:002013-11-11T19:55:48.568-06:00A better way or thinking is like this: Grid lines ...A better way or thinking is like this: Grid lines should remain a category, the bubbles should simply be an annotation tag family. Where the tags intersect with an annotation crop region the grid bubble annotation tag should become visible. The programmers at Autodesk have to learn to think outside of the box (no pun intended).Shadowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17382095572139766805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-41726346067720803612013-03-21T00:15:47.335-05:002013-03-21T00:15:47.335-05:00Andy, the only thing I can think of that would res...Andy, the only thing I can think of that would reset your grid edits is if the extents were not actually switched to 2D extents. However if you jog the grid bubble, that edit should always stick, although if the length of the gridline is still governed by 3D extents (the unfilled circle), it would move along with the crop region of the view. The jog in the grid bubble should not get re-set though.Dave Baldacchinohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00431940617680243953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-29265776776837373402013-03-12T15:58:39.268-05:002013-03-12T15:58:39.268-05:00Dave I just tried that and thank you for the reply...Dave I just tried that and thank you for the reply. It seems that it works for the views it propagates to (and by the way I didn’t unfold the views receiving propagation). But when I re-constrain, it does not retain 2d mods within the view I applied the temp 'unfold' routine to... mud? Basically view A1 fixed B1, C1, and D1. But A1 returned to its formed state when re-constrained. andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13519038913597751852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-16976140439440362662013-03-12T13:58:37.204-05:002013-03-12T13:58:37.204-05:00Andy, temporarily remove the scope box, then uncro...Andy, temporarily remove the scope box, then uncrop and do the propagate operation. Then re-assign the scope box. Yes, it has become a bit more laborious unfortuntely and still doesn't work as most users expect it to (just got a question about it this week in fact).Dave Baldacchinohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00431940617680243953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-54713171583121419972013-03-12T12:20:52.636-05:002013-03-12T12:20:52.636-05:00what about grids in 2013 and scope boxes.... now w...what about grids in 2013 and scope boxes.... now we cant uncrop if scope box constrains (were able to in 2011 and 12)... seems like the work around no longer works....around...andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13519038913597751852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-51972679693704481952011-08-21T00:20:30.549-05:002011-08-21T00:20:30.549-05:00Great fix/workaround! I was stuck and had no idea ...Great fix/workaround! I was stuck and had no idea why. Not sure it's a bug, but I think it's implemented wrong either by design or accident. Thanks again.Jeremy Dealhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17943157494257552782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-63384460220417447762011-01-19T17:56:44.143-06:002011-01-19T17:56:44.143-06:00Hmmm never thought of it that way. In my limited e...Hmmm never thought of it that way. In my limited experience, I've always found that most plan views are cropped, even overall plans. So if programmers assumed that using this tool on cropped views would be an exception, it really should be more of a rule I think. Say you have a building and you split in in 4 areas. Now you'll have a set of plans for each area (dimension plans, furniture &Dave Baldacchinohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00431940617680243953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8569516199116206255.post-76323374465364553582011-01-19T17:34:57.401-06:002011-01-19T17:34:57.401-06:00You say bug, I say paradox...
A view that is crop...You say bug, I say paradox...<br /><br />A view that is cropped will likely have different, possible exclusive needs compared with other views. It was probably a lot more work to examine every other view to see if a crop boundary was active and within a size range to "match" the view you are using as a gaugue so that the extents could be propagated successfully.<br /><br />I suspect Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14230364057800484763noreply@blogger.com